
The Human Centipede (First Sequence)
dir. Tom Six
43
6 sourcesSynopsis
During a stopover in Germany in the middle of a carefree road trip through Europe, two American girls find themselves alone at night when their car breaks down in the woods. Searching for help at a nearby villa, they are wooed into the clutches of a deranged retired surgeon, who has a very disturbed vision.
Critics consensus
Grotesque, visceral and hard to (ahem) swallow, this surgical horror doesn't quite earn its stripes because the gross-outs overwhelm and devalue everything else.
What resonated with audiences
'The Human Centipede (First Sequence)' delivers a wildly original and disturbing vision with a successfully twisted dark tone that creates palpable dread. Dieter Laser's phenomenal performance as the mad scientist stands out, though supporting cast acting disappoints. The film divides audiences sharply: some find it compellingly horrifying, while others consider it their worst viewing experience. Universal criticism targets the threadbare writing, implausible premise, and underdeveloped characters. The concept's effectiveness remains polarizing—genuinely unsettling for some, merely gross for others.

Directed byTom Six
StarringDieter Laser, Winter Williams (Formerly Ashley C. Williams), Ashlynn Yennie, Akihiro Kitamura, Andreas Leupold, Peter Blankenstein
Written byTom Six
CinematographyGoof de Koning
EditingNigel de Hond
MusicHoleg Spies
The Human Centipede (First Sequence)
2009 · R · 1h 32m
Horror
During a stopover in Germany in the middle of a carefree road trip through Europe, two American girls find themselves alone at night when their car breaks down in the woods. Searching for help at a nearby villa, they are wooed into the clutches of a deranged retired surgeon, who has a very disturbed vision.
Our Verdict
43
What resonated with audiences
'The Human Centipede (First Sequence)' delivers a wildly original and disturbing vision with a successfully twisted dark tone that creates palpable dread. Dieter Laser's phenomenal performance as the mad scientist stands out, though supporting cast acting disappoints. The film divides audiences sharply: some find it compellingly horrifying, while others consider it their worst viewing experience. Universal criticism targets the threadbare writing, implausible premise, and underdeveloped characters. The concept's effectiveness remains polarizing—genuinely unsettling for some, merely gross for others.
Critics Consensus
Grotesque, visceral and hard to (ahem) swallow, this surgical horror doesn't quite earn its stripes because the gross-outs overwhelm and devalue everything else.
